Open letter to CBS News
Fri May 11, 2007 at 05:01:35 PM PDT
Although it took the suits at Black Rock over a week to decide that Don Imus "crossed the line" by uttering disgusting racial slurs over its airwaves, a General speaking his conscience brought swift and decisive action... one to which I felt compelled to respond. My letter to CBS follows the jump.
Regarding CBS' firing of General John Batiste as a consultant, I would be among the first to affirm the network's right to craft and enforce its internal policies as it sees fit. I would be loathe to encroach on CBS's rights as a private employer, and even more importantly, as a part of a free and independent press under the United States Constitution.
However, it is impossible not to notice that in firing the General and citing his own exercise of his free speech rights as a citizen, the network is engaging in a peculiar form of hypocrisy, at best, and revealing its own political biases at worst. This would be mitigated if CBS' cited policy against retaining "advocates" as news consultants were evenly applied. However, the network keeps on its payroll such vociferous pro-administration and pro-war voices as Michael O'Hanlon and Sandy Genelius, while silencing on its airwaves only the General. It is difficult to come to any conclusion other than that it was the General's position which ran afoul of CBS policy.
If CBS is serious about objectivity in its news division, and enforcement of a "no advocacy" policy is a sincere attempt at preserving that objectivity, then it must be applied as aggressively toward advocates of continued occupation of Iraq by United States forces as it is against those who seek an end to that occupation.
The "Tiffany network" has come a long way from the day when Walter Cronkite courageously declared on air that, as an American, he could no longer support our country's military adventure in Viet Nam. CBS was alone among the networks in reporting the Watergate break-in, and indications of an ongoing White House conspiracy to cover it up. In spite of, or perhaps in part because of those "lapses" into advocacy, Cronkite remained the "most trusted man in America" for decades thereafter. Now the network seeks to avoid the appearance of "advocacy," except when echoing the talking points of that same White House. And that's the way it is.
Permalink | 10 comments